by shostakovich » Sat Mar 03, 2001 1:51 pm
Amateur or professional??? Modesty forbids. <P> I once wrote to William Flanagan, then editor of High Fidelity Magazine about feeling left out of the music scene because I loved music, but had no "talent" for it, and asking what kind of active role a person like myself could play. Well, he answered that the appreciation of music WAS a talent. That helped my esteem. No job offer came with the letter, though. I pass this on so that if any reader feels left out because of inactive participation in music, be assured you DO have a talent for music. <P>It's been noted that "professional" music lover means making a buck from it. I've made a few bucks from teaching and lecturing about it, but I would not want to give up my amateur standing. The photographer, Alfred Stieglitz, once compared "amateur" vs "professional" in his field. He felt that the amateur working for love of his subject was often superior to the professional who did it for the money. I'm with Stieglitz on that. Take heart.<BR>Shos