Hi guys, i was just passing by and i saw a mahler ranking, so i couldn't resist to add my 2 cents. <P>The 1st choice is prefferable in most cases <P>#1: Bernstein, RCO, DG, 1987 or Horenstein, LSO, Unicorn, 1969<BR>#2: Bernstein, NYP, DG, 1987 or Rattle, CBSO, EMI, 1986<BR>#3: Salonen, LAP, Sony, 1997 or Bernstein, NYP, DG, 1987<BR>#4: Maazel, VPO, Sony, 1983 or Levi, Atlanta SO, Telarc, 1998 <- GET THIS!<BR>#5: Chailly, RCO, Decca, 1997 or Barshai, Junge Deutsche Philharmonie, Laurel, 1997<BR>#6: Tennstedt, LPO, EMI, 1983; Sanderling, Saint Petersburg PO, RS, 1995<BR>(I also love Barbirolli, New Philharmonia, EMI, 1967 and Bernstein, VPO, DG, 1988) <BR>#7: Abbado, BPO, DG, 2001 or Tilson Thomas, LSO, RCA, 1997<BR>#8: Chailly, RCO, Decca, 2000 or Sinopoli, Philharmonia, DG, 1990<BR>#9: Abbado, BPO, DG, 1999 or Haitink, RCO, Philips, 1969 (I have yet to find a perfect m9)<BR>#10: Rattle, BPO, EMI, 1999 (Cooke) or Litton, Dallas SO, Delos, 2001 (Carpenter) <- GET THIS<BR>DLVDE: Ludwig, Wunderlich, Klemperer, Philharmonia, EMI, 1964-6 or Baker, King, Haitink, RCO, Phllips, 1975<P>If someone wants to contact me privately, i have an ftp with a considerable ammount of handpicked '1st rate' mahler recordings (About 13 GBs). My mail is
etoyoc38@hotmail.com<P>Why people like so much Barbirolli's 5th, Klemperer's 9th or Szell's 6th is a mistery to me. I for myself consider them among the most overrated mahler recordings ever. Not to mention Kaplan's resurrection that fortunately wasn't mentioned yet

<P>Cheers!<p>[ 04-24-2003: Message edited by: Luis ]