Moderator: Nicole Marie
Hmmm. While I appreciate your analysis of Mrs. O'Connor's consideration of the cases before her, I also find that, for many of us, what is and is not Constitutional is, in many cases, clear and easily decided.Originally posted by piqaboo:
No, but it implies she thought about each case, rather than making up her mind before her appointment, then voting her internal party-line regardless. Now you've got me wondering why they bother to harrass the presenting attorneys.
I have to admit that at least the current crop of self-proclaimed borrow-and-spend, regulate-your-bedroom "conservatives" have corrupted the term beyond all recognition.Originally posted by piqaboo:
I dont think conservative = constructionist anymore, if it ever did.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users