Moderator: Nicole Marie
jamiebk wrote:Well...she obviously disagrees with the Church's stand on the matter. So why be conforntational about it? It would serve no purpose. I am sure the Pope was hoping to make some headway with her on the subject, however, she and any other women are free to practice their opinions and keep to them. I am no fan of Mrs Pelosi but she can hold to whatever belief or interpretation she chooses within the law.

Haggis@wk wrote:It seems alot like joining AA then getting offended when they oject to your bringing a bottle to the meetings.
Why belong in the first place? Presumably at sometime in her early life she came to a decision that put her at a fundamental cross purpose with her church; why didn't she leave?
jamiebk wrote:As you describe the Catholic church is exactly why I am a Presbyterian
Shapley wrote:Haggis@wk wrote:It seems alot like joining AA then getting offended when they oject to your bringing a bottle to the meetings.
Why belong in the first place? Presumably at sometime in her early life she came to a decision that put her at a fundamental cross purpose with her church; why didn't she leave?
That's my question. I can only assume the 'fact' that she is Catholic has some appeal to a large part of her voter base.jamiebk wrote:As you describe the Catholic church is exactly why I am a Presbyterian
I'm not really familiar with the cathecism of the Presyterian church. I take it their dogma is not rigidly dogmatic?
Haggis@wk wrote:It seems alot like joining AA then getting offended when they oject to your bringing a bottle to the meetings.
Why belong in the first place? Presumably at sometime in her early life she came to a decision that put her at a fundamental cross purpose with her church; why didn't she leave?
jamiebk wrote:As you describe the Catholic church is exactly why I am a Presbyterian

jamiebk wrote:As they say....my Karma just ran over your dogma.
His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church's consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death
Selma in Sandy Eggo wrote:Actually, from my viewpoint, the problem between the Pope and the Politician is that the Pope is pressing the Politician to impose the Pope's morality on all the Politician's constituents.
I don't much care for natural law, moral or otherwise. Or "natural death". I like modern technology and medicine, with the concomitant high survival rate among our infants and the resulting requirement that we control conception to avoid overwhelming our food supplies. A healthy woman can have another baby every couple of years, from puberty to menopause. In my case, that would add up to about eighteen children. Since I believe in vaccination and sanitation and public health, I'd probably have had to raise most or all of them. Forbidding effective conception control, as His Holiness With The High Horse does, is just crazy. Do the math.
Shapley wrote:Gov. Palin, other politicians told to pay back taxes
Do any politicians pay their taxes?
Haggis@wk wrote:Given his reputation for self promotion and grandstanding I don't think he's going to go or at least not of his own freewill.
jamiebk wrote:They will have to indict him or something.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]