Moderator: Nicole Marie
Yep. I didn't like the idea of a recall, I mean he was just voted in. But then I thought about last year when I was having to decide who was the lesser of two evils. I didn't like my choices.Originally posted by barfle:
Of course, the Republicans selected a vote pariah as his opponent last year, so he would have had to murder someone in order to lose that election.
I'm curious where this info came from...from what I understand the president cannot impact statements from the CDC - it's an independent and autonomous organization. Although it falls under the executive branch (all agencies do) about all the president can do is fire the head - but that's a nightmare in and of itself.Originally posted by Nicole Marie:
Reagan did not allow the CDC to make announcements that AIDS could effect the heterosexual population. As long as it was popping up as a "gay" disease he did not care about it. But memebers of the CDC were telling him it could and would pop up in the heterosexual population and early announcements to the general population could save lives. He turned them down, he only allowed press releases of AIDS to be titled as "Gay Cancer", the rest of the public thought nothing of it. But I'm not letting this thread be turned away from what's it for, California. Back to the west coast.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users