She blew off a little steam and ash today. So what of it?
From what I've read, it sounds as though the media is speculating about subterranian "magma flow", as if the mountain may start spewing great gouts of red-hot lava.
It doesn't happen that way from that type of volcano.
Mt. St. Helens, as well as the other peaks in the Cascade chain, are sitting on top of what are called pyroclastic flows. It is lava that's not quite as hot as you see on all of the documentaries. It doesn't glow red, and doesn't flow like water. It moves very slowly, and a significantly greater amount of pressure is required to get it to move, let alone erupt. That was why the 1980 eruption was so devastating.
My opinion: MSH is rebuilding. The 1980 eruption blew ~half of the mountain away. I'll bet we see periodic small eruptions like today's for the next 120 years or so(if we manage to not wipe ourselves off the face of the Earth before then), until it looks more or less like a graceful, snow-capped Cascade peak, then will blow its top once again.
