jamiebk wrote:We have 20,000,000 of these people in the US and we're worried about this one? A waste of time.
We have 20,000 assaults in the U.S. every year, should we quit investigating them as well??
Moderator: Nicole Marie
jamiebk wrote:We have 20,000,000 of these people in the US and we're worried about this one? A waste of time.
Haggis@wk wrote:jamiebk wrote:We have 20,000,000 of these people in the US and we're worried about this one? A waste of time.
We have 20,000 assaults in the U.S. every year, should we quit investigating them as well??
jamiebk wrote:Haggis@wk wrote:jamiebk wrote:We have 20,000,000 of these people in the US and we're worried about this one? A waste of time.
We have 20,000 assaults in the U.S. every year, should we quit investigating them as well??
Not my point. I suggest that something be done about the OTHER 20,000,000 illegals as well. Seems like an awful lot of attention paid to just one.
Haggis@wk wrote:you can only work 'em one at a time.
20?? I thought the popular census was 12.
Haggis@wk wrote:you can only work 'em one at a time.
20?? I thought the popular census was 12.
Haggis@wk wrote:you can only work 'em one at a time.
20?? I thought the popular census was 12.
And if the president doesn't agree [to push amnesty legislation]? "We will go into the field," says [Rep. Luis] Gutierrez, "like the civil rights movement and the suffragists did." "We will escalate," says Gustavo Torres of Casa de Maryland, "to civil disobedience."
Haggis@wk wrote:I predict that amnesty’s dead for at least another year.
This Sunday's illegal-alien march in Washington will make it even harder to move amnesty — there's going to be a lot of anger. Hopefully, there will be lots of Che Guevara posters and "This Is Our Land" demands, along with the American flags that organizers no doubt bought in bulk at Costco to hand out. And Harold Meyerson's column in the Post offers delicious hints of even better political theater to come:And if the president doesn't agree [to push amnesty legislation]? "We will go into the field," says [Rep. Luis] Gutierrez, "like the civil rights movement and the suffragists did." "We will escalate," says Gustavo Torres of Casa de Maryland, "to civil disobedience."
Civil disobedience! By illegal aliens demanding amnesty! I can't wait.
Tell you what....how about a bunch of American citizen sneak into China...suck off of their social services for years and stage a rally for equal rights and citizenship. Can you say Jail? Can you say deportation? How about getting shot? Sheesh
Shapley wrote:...put to the legislature largely at the behest of Sheriff Joe Arpayo...
Haggis@wk wrote:Illegal immigrants plan to leave over Ariz. Law
If we'd only known it'd be that simple!!!!![]()
![]()
Standing near potted trees and bushes for sale at a Home Depot in east Phoenix, Diaz, 35, says he may follow three families in his neighborhood who moved to New Mexico because of the law. He says a friend is finding plenty of work in Dallas
Arizona epitomizes what every Republican — indeed, every American — should embrace: attrition through enforcement. For years, the open-borders crowd has claimed that the only two responses to illegal immigration are amnesty or mass roundups. That is nonsense. Attrition through enforcement presents an effective third option that respects the rule of law. By stepping up the enforcement of immigration laws through state-level action, Arizona has induced thousands of illegal aliens to self-deport. Need proof? In early 2008, after Arizona’s E-Verify law went into effect, the neighboring Mexican state of Sonora sent a delegation to the Arizona legislature to protest that Arizona was causing too many Mexican nationals to return to Mexico too quickly, overwhelming the housing stock and public infrastructure of Sonora.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]