Moderator: Nicole Marie
The DOJ has rejected a Freedom of Information Act request from the New York Times that asked the agency to reveal the legal basis for the newly unveiled American program of strategic drone-attack assassinations of American citizens off the field of battle
• The government dropped a bomb on a U.S. citizen,
• who, though a total d**k and probably a criminal, may have been engaged only in propaganda,
• which, though despicable, is generally protected by the First Amendment;
• it did so without a trial or even an indictment (that we know of),
• based at least in part on evidence it says it has but won't show anyone,
• and on a legal argument it has apparently made but won't show anyone,
• and the very existence of which it will not confirm or deny;
• although don't worry, because the C.I.A. would never kill an American without having somebody do a memo first;
• and this is the "most transparent administration ever";
• currently run by a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Giant Communist Robot wrote:Complaining about the lack of rights for terrorists like al-Awlaki (and this was the person whose rights were at issue in the link) seems a little far to the left for you, Haggis.
Besides, their best bud Barry would never kill someone who doesn't deserve it, would he?
Giant Communist Robot wrote: Is this how you feel about al-Awlaki?
,...though a total d**k and probably a criminal, may have been engaged only in propaganda
all and good, show us."levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
...or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]