Your conclusion cant be drawn from my posts.
ALF is a big furry alien. Im sure he is always kindly towards animals. I dont know why he needs a spokesperson, but that person should certainly be paid for doing the job, but I have no idea why anyone would make a big deal of it.....
the SITE under discussion did not give the example of vandalism. You did. Perhaps because all I read was the update on the site, I missed something. Perhaps it was just a supplement. Either way, it was vague, frantic and nasty. Where I work, an update includes the entire original, which is what I was expecting. I can be edumacated. (probably)
I made no conclusion regarding employment of nasty people. Nor have I ever stated that I support HSUS.
I will not accept the site's definition of what a Humane Society "should" be. It is what it is. If others (animal shelters) borrowed the name, so be it. PacMan didnt raise money for political lobbying either. Eeek.
So, I still question the site.
I did check some other organizations as presented on the site. In some cases the site presents a straightforward finanacial analysis. In others they rant (CSPI oh my!), with more or less support for their rantings. Ok, they have an opinion. Where they support the opinion, I am intrigued enough to follow up with additional googlage. Where they dont, I disregard them entirely. Their tone of voice leads me to that reaction.
But somehow, this got twisted from a discussion of the quality of a website to whether or not I support terrorism. I dont. Tsky tsky tsky. <finger shaking icon>
Altoid - curiously strong.